Slavery’s Interior: Cinema and the
Performative Traumas of History
Anthony Reed
I would not have
readily associated cinema focused on slavery with love and desire, but looking
at desire from a completely unromantic standpoint was refreshing. It called to
mind an article I came across a few months ago about prisoners finding
themselves ill adjusted upon reintroduction to the outside world. (link: http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local_news/article/Convictcouldn-thandlebeing-free-2187648.php)
The focus was on a prisoner who found himself unhappy and uncomfortable in
typical society and opted to perform an act of arson in order to return to the
life he knew in jail. This seems to be a common occurrence among newly freed
prisoners. When inmates come to face their day of release, they realize that
the reality of their freedom does not fit the idealized image they had created.
Of course, their desire to return to prison is affected by a number of other
factors, including feelings of alienation or an inability to function without
the daily structure imposed by life in prison.
Although I’m not
familiar with film in the slavery genre, I took an interest in Reed’s
discussion of Django, which used
modern societal ideals to build character empathy and convey the tragedy of
slavery. The protagonist, Django, is driven by a desire for vengeance and a
romantic desire to save his wife. Dr. Reed specifically noted that he seems
relatively uninterested in the fate of other slaves or the ‘big picture’ of
freedom. I would imagine that in reality, an enslaved person would be driven by
the natural desire for freedom, not romance or revenge, but romantic desire is
more relatable in current times. Most audience members, myself included, may
not be able to identify with the burning desire imposed by such oppression,
simply for a lack of similar experiences. Romantic and vengeful desire,
however, are incredibly common human experiences and are therefore easily
relatable.
A theme that seems
common to desire – not only in romantic desire but in other arenas as well – is
the act of denying the desires of others as a source of personal empowerment. Depriving
Africans of their freedom afforded slave owners the physical and political
power they desired. At the time, it was accepted that this deprivation was the
only means available to find any sense of fulfillment of this desire. Through a
vastly different lens, characters like the Bad Girl and Conchita were similarly
fueled by their ability to monopolize what others so desired. We see this theme
appear across history and politics, but also in personal and professional
relationships. An individual’s desire for power often leads to the withholding
of the desires of others.
No comments:
Post a Comment